Shahid Beheshti University Arabic Literature Bulletin 2588-6835 7 1 2016 04 20 Literary Metacriticism in the Works of Seyyed Mortazda Literary Metacriticism in the Works of Seyyed Mortazda 75 104 98281 FA Ali Saberi Associate Professor Departman of Arabic Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Central Branch, Muhammad Amin Taghavi Fardood Assistant Professor in Lrabic language in Imam Sadique University, Tehran, Journal Article 2015 05 18 The present article, studies Seyyed Mortadza's  metacritical theories by examining  his works as well as the works of literary writers who have studied Seyyed Mortadza's literary and critical theories. studying his works indicates that his three works Omalley, Al-Shahab and tayf Alkhyal enjoys the most literary critical theories, and we tried to find out what different perspectives Seyyed Mortazda had in comparison to his contemporaries and predecessors? And what steps has he  taken in the development of literary metacritical thoughts? In a process of cross-sectional study we also found that he has promoted his critical knowledge by clarifying some critical theories prevalent in his time and also by utilizing some theories of literary critical theorists such as "Jahez", "Ibn Qtybh", "Amudi" and etcetera. In addition to considering some critical theories of his time, he has also judged about critical methods of equilibrium and  differentiation by the means of his knowledge in different fields of theology, jurisprudence, interpretation, etc. He  has theorized about critical thoughts  in the process of his studying literary works and has offered new critical methods in criticizing literary works The present article, studies Seyyed Mortadza's  metacritical theories by examining  his works as well as the works of literary writers who have studied Seyyed Mortadza's literary and critical theories. studying his works indicates that his three works Omalley, Al-Shahab and tayf Alkhyal enjoys the most literary critical theories, and we tried to find out what different perspectives Seyyed Mortazda had in comparison to his contemporaries and predecessors? And what steps has he  taken in the development of literary metacritical thoughts? In a process of cross-sectional study we also found that he has promoted his critical knowledge by clarifying some critical theories prevalent in his time and also by utilizing some theories of literary critical theorists such as "Jahez", "Ibn Qtybh", "Amudi" and etcetera. In addition to considering some critical theories of his time, he has also judged about critical methods of equilibrium and  differentiation by the means of his knowledge in different fields of theology, jurisprudence, interpretation, etc. He  has theorized about critical thoughts  in the process of his studying literary works and has offered new critical methods in criticizing literary works https://jalc.sbu.ac.ir/article_98281_f1589432f623a88911e2abeb5fd6d452.pdf